Thermage tightens it's own skin.

From the 'its tough all over' front, Thermage (Solta Medical) reports a loss

Solta Medical, Inc. (SLTM: News  Thermage) reported fourth quarter net loss of $15.04 million or $0.57 per share, compared to net income of $990 thousand or $ 0.04 per share in the same quarter of last year. 

Non-GAAP net loss for the quarter was $3.50 million or $0.13 per share, compared to net income of $2.08 million or $0.08 per share in the year ago quarter.

Net revenues for the quarter declined to $9.55 million from $16.58 million in the prior year quarter.

On a pro forma combined basis as if the acquisition of Reliant Technologies was effective as of October 1, 2008, revenue for the fourth quarter would have been $20.1 million, which is based on Thermage standalone revenue of $8.7 million and Reliant standalone revenue of $11.4 million. This compares to revenue for both companies of $35.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2007 on a pro forma combined basis.

Fraxel, Thermage, and CO2 Laser Physician Chat

You'll want to make you take advantage of the newest feature on Medical Spa MD, MAPAs live discussions and chat archive.

Last Chat: Tuesday, Jan 27 at 8PM EST
Thermage, Fraxel, and CO2 Laser Ablation

The discussion will include treatment perameters, effectivness, cost, the technolgies and anything else of interest. Physicians with experience are invited but the chat is open to any interested parties. Fraxel, Thermage or other reps who identify themselves and are willing to engage in open discusion are also welcome.

The transcripts of previous chats on Marketing and Fraxel are already available on the new MAPA Chat Archive along with a new area for reviews of medical spa technologies.

Thermage changes its name to Solta Medical

Thermage Inc., has changed its name to Solta Medical Inc. and unveiled a new logo, along with a new logo and website for the Thermage product.

Theremage the company bought Reliant Technologies, maker of the laser resurfacing device Fraxel, for $87.5 million in a cash and stock deal last year. The new ticker symbol will be "SLTM" and is listed on the Nasdaq.

The design of the new Thermage site a fine change from the stagnant templates that most of the IPL and laser companies use. We'll have to see how it works for them.

From the Solta press release:

Thermage, Inc. (NASDAQ: THRM) announced that effective today it has changed its corporate name to Solta Medical, Inc. At the open of the NASDAQ exchange this morning, Solta Medical, Inc. will begin trading under the symbol “SLTM.”

"The name and ticker symbol changes are a great start to the New Year and a key milestone in the integration of the acquisition of Reliant Technologies, Inc. The new company combines the industry’s two leading brands, Thermage® and Fraxel®, under a new corporate name that will now form a global leader in aesthetic energy devices,” said Stephen J. Fanning, chairman of the board, president and CEO. “Solta Medical will focus on providing superior anti-aging solutions for patients and physicians by offering the gold standard of care for tightening, contouring and resurfacing of the skin with Thermage and Fraxel treatments.”

Solta Medical also announced the expansion of its industry-exclusive customer loyalty program which allows physicians to lock-in preferred pricing for Thermage and Fraxel treatment tips along with other preferred customer benefits to help physicians grow their practices and increase practice profitability.

“Thermage and Fraxel are the strongest aesthetic device brands available to physicians today,” said Suzanne Bruce, MD, dermatologist and president of Suzanne Bruce and Associates in Houston, Texas. “By combining these two brands into one company and expanding the customer loyalty program, Solta Medical is opening a number of new opportunities for doctors to conveniently and cost-effectively access a full suite of safe and effective anti-aging solutions.”

Thermage Lips: Plump yer pucker.

'Thermage Introduces Lips by Thermage, a New Non-Invasive Aesthetic Procedure for Lips  Offering consumers fuller, more defined looking lips without injections'

..%5CSA%5CHTML%5Cimages%5Cthumbs%5C1_NewProd_Thermage_C9D92tif.jpg
 
Plasticized says: "This new marketing tool for a now commonly found machine in aesthetic offices uses a small tip to tighten the skin around the lips, minimizing lines. It may also promote fuller lips by stimulating collagen formation.
Still, we are skeptical. The procedure is costly due to the extremely expensive, disposable tips that must be bought from the same company.
This could be an appropiate time to invoke the adage, "To a hammer, the world is a nail". 

Reactivated Thermage Tips: Thermage responds to supposed study.

Thermage's response to physicians purchasing reactivated tips from abroad.

 
..%5CSA%5CHTML%5Cimages%5Cthumbs%5C1_NewProd_Thermage_C9D92tif.jpgClint Carnell, VP of Thermage, asked me to post Thermages position on reactivating tips. I have posted it in it's entirety and have added an addendum to the previous post on the supposed study in question.

You'll notice that Clint asks me to remove the post to that study. I've exchanged a number of emails with Clint and he's agreed that the best course of action for Thermage to take will be to have this connected to reactivation post. The study in question is posted a number of times on the web and since this site is likely the first stop, it's also Thermages best option to position a counterpoint where someone searching for reactivated Thermage tips will be exposed to Thermage's position and opinion.

Thermage's position on the supposed study for reactivating Thermage tips: 

I am Vice President of Domestic Sales for Thermage, Inc. 

On your Medical Spa MD web page your blog entitled “Study: Safety & Performance of Reactivated Thermage Thermacool Tips,” gives a summary of a study which allegedly investigated the safety and performance of reactivated Thermage treatment tips, as well as a link to the study publication.  The publication claims Thermage treatment tips can safely withstand 50,000 shots.   

blockquote.gif  We have strong reasons to believe the study referred to in the publication never occurred, and that it is a pure fabrication being made by a non-US company to promote their product.  Overusing our treatment tips as suggested by the publication will burn patients.  blockquoteend.gif

We have strong reasons to believe the study referred to in the publication never occurred, and that it is a pure fabrication being made by a non-US company to promote their product.  Overusing our treatment tips as suggested by the publication will burn patients.  

We have conducted a thorough investigation.  We have been unable to locate the supposed author of this study and publication, Michael Stevens M.D., where the study was conducted, any documentation associated with the study other than the study publication, or any of the patients or “experts” who participated in or are referenced in the publication.   

In addition, the data reported by the study is inherently unbelievable.  The study purports to have treated 2,400 patients over a twelve month period (see under “Results” line 1, 1200 patients were treated with reactivated tips, and nine paragraphs earlier reference is made to an equal size control group).  In this industry this would be an enormously large and expensive study (200 patients a month for a year).  Though not impossible to do, it is highly unlikely such a large study occurred (and no one would have heard of it or anyone who was involved in it) given the significant costs and logistics it would require.  For comparison, the largest study we know of involving Thermage is a four year study conducted by Weiss,1 and it only involved 600 patients or one quarter the number Stevens alleges.  In addition, the claims in the Stevens publication are also wildly inconsistent with immense quantities of Thermage quality and reliability data we have compiled on our own products over the years.  We know for a fact the dielectric membrane on our treatment tip will break down when subjected to a tiny fraction of the repeated use this publication alleges can be done.  Dielectric breakdown can result in patient harm.   

So not only does summarizing or republishing a bogus study spread falsehoods, in this case it can endanger patients as well.  The very nature of this study falsely implies that it is a structured, documented and well accepted article.  In fact it is not and the potential use of this study by either a physician and/or patient could lead to poor decision making and patient harm.  We believe it’s in both our best interests to provide the best information possible in order to minimize potential patient complications.  So we ask that you delete your summary blog and link to this publication. 

Of course if you know of any collaborating evidence of any kind supporting either the fact that this study ever happened or the veracity of any of the data or claims made in this publication, we would be very interested in reviewing it.   

We thank you for your cooperation. 

Very truly yours,

Clint Carnell

Vice President of US Sales

1  Weiss, R.A. et. al. Monopolar Radiofrequency Facial Tightening: A Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety in Over 600 Treatments.  Journal of Drugs in Dermatology – Vol. 5; Issue 8; 707-712; September 2006.

Thermage tackes it's safety reputation among physicians.

This post was written for Medical Spa MD by Thermage.

Thermage Safety - The whole story

Clint Carnell, Thermage, VP Domestic Sales 

 
thermage_logo.gifIn reply to your recent blog entitled “Thermage: Do plastic surgeons hate everything non-surgical?”  I am Vice President of Domestic Sales for Thermage:

Much is written about the risks of Thermage, in particular the risk of fat atrophy and surface irregularities referred to in your blog.  Though there were some initial infrequent reports of such effects associated with Thermage after its product was released in 2002, the simple fact is that today Thermage is an extremely safe procedure, and has been so for several years. 

Thermage invented the concept of using non-invasive radio frequency energy for tissue tightening and contouring.  Thermage launched its first product in late 2002.  Though the overwhelming majority of initial treatments were problem free, fat atrophy and surface irregularities were reported in 0.23% of the procedures (2.3 per 1000 patients) in 2002-2003. 

Thermage’s investigation revealed that 100% of the early reports were from 6% of its physician practitioners. 

Our investigation also revealed the cause was over treatment – using excessively high energy settings.  If relatively high treatment settings are used, it is possible to overheat deeper tissue, especially in thin-skinned individuals.  The use of nerve blocks, tumescent anesthesia, and/or intravenous sedation that completely blocked patient pain perception and feedback was also found to be a contributing factor. 

In response to these findings, in January-February 2004, Thermage launched an aggressive physician education program instructing physicians to adopt treatment techniques to avoid tissue overheating.  The techniques included: 

  1. Use of a treatment grid to avoid pulse stacking.

  2. Use of multiple passes at moderate power settings rather than single passes at higher energy settings.

  3. Allow 2 minutes between passes to allow temperature reequilibration.

  4. Use patient feedback of heat sensation, and treat to a heat sensation level of 2-2.5 on a scale of 0-4 (4 being maximum sensation).

  5. Use minimal pain blocking.

  6. Pay special attention to patient feedback while treating thin-skinned areas. 

As reported by Narins (1), these new treatment techniques proved to be immensely successful.  During the 6 months following their introduction, the reported incidence of fat atrophy and surface irregularities decreased by a factor of roughly 6 (to 0.04%), and there were no reported incidents in the last half of 2004.  This improving trend has continued to the present.  For example, the reported incidence of fat atrophy and surface irregularities for all of 2006 was 0.016% (less than 2 cases in 10,000).  A similar dramatic decline in all other reported adverse events (e.g., burns, welts, swelling/edema, etc.) has also been observed.  Today, Thermage is an extremely safe procedure. 

In addition to significantly increasing patient safety, the new treatment guidelines have also significantly reduced the discomfort of treatment, since physicians now treat to a very tolerable heat sensation level of 2-2.5. 

Finally, the new treatment guidelines, in particular the use of multiple passes at moderate settings, have also significantly increased efficacy from that reported initially in 2002-2003.  Several peer-reviewed studies show Thermage patient satisfaction to be higher than 80%, and continuing to improve over time.2,3,4  Thermage results are most notably perceptible when it comes to an eyebrow lift or softening of the nasolabial fold, and provide a remarkably natural look.  However, we do acknowledge Thermage results can sometimes be subtle and are not nearly as dramatic as those produced by surgery. 
 

References 

1  Narins, RS, et. al.  Overtreatment Effects Associated with a Radiofrequency Tissue Tightening Device: Rare, Preventable, and Correctable with Subcision and Autologous Fat Transfer. Dermatology Surgery 2006;32:115-124; January 2006. 

2  Weiss, R.A. et. al.  Monopolar Radiofrequency Facial Tightening: A Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety in Over 600 Treatments. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology – Vol. 5; Issue 8; 707-712; September 2006. 

3  Finzi, E. et. al.  Multipass Vector (Mpave) Technique with Nonablative Radiofrequency to Treat Facial and Neck Laxity.  Dermatol Surg 31 (8 Pt 1); 916-22; August 2005. 

4 Biesman, B. et. al.   Monopolar Radiofrequency Treatment of Human Eyelids: A Prospective, Multicenter, Efficacy Trial.  Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 38:890-898; December 2006.

Thermage, Inc. Reports Record Revenue: It feels like I'm paying most of it.

Thermage, Inc. Reports Record Revenue and First Quarter Results Q1 Revenue Increases by 22% and Gross Profit Increases by 27% Over Prior Year Period

 

thermageTip.jpgHAYWARD, Calif., May 1 -- Thermage, Inc. (Nasdaq: THRM), a leader in non-invasive tissue tightening in the aesthetic industry, today reported financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2007.

Revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was $15.2 million, up 22% from $12.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Gross profit increased to $11.0 million or 72.6% of revenue, for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, up from $8.7 million or 69.6% of revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.

The Company reported GAAP net income of $0.1 million, or breakeven earnings per share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, versus a net loss of $2.8 million, or $0.68 per share, for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Non- GAAP (1) net income for the first quarter of 2007 was $1.3 million, or $0.05 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $0.7 million, or $0.04 per share, for the prior year period.

"We continued to produce over 70% of sales from our high margin consumables products," said Stephen J. Fanning, President and Chief Executive Officer. "In addition, in mid-February we began shipping our new generator platform, ThermaCool NXT(TM), and received strong worldwide demand from both new and existing customers. As a result, we sold more generators in the first quarter than in any previous quarter for over the past two years."

"In January, we introduced a new procedure, Hands by Thermage(TM), with a corresponding new treatment tip," continued Mr. Fanning. "This is the first of several new procedures and treatment tips we plan to launch in 2007 that are designed to expand the range of applications for Thermage procedures, improve patient outcomes, and increase the value proposition for our customers."

"We continue to build the Thermage brand. In April, we launched Stars of Thermage(TM), an on-line DTC media campaign that features the real-life experiences of women who have had the Thermage procedure. We continue to be pleased with the high profile media coverage of Thermage generated recently in media such as US Magazine, USA Today, MSN Health and Fitness, and The Learning Channel. We have good momentum and will continue our strong marketing efforts to drive patient demand for Thermage applications," concluded Mr. Fanning.

Guidance: Management expects revenue for full year 2007 to be in a range of $65 million to $68 million, an increase of 20% to 25% over full year 2006. For the full year 2007, we expect GAAP diluted earnings per share to be in a range of a net loss of $0.04 per share to net income of $0.03 per share. Non-GAAP (1) diluted earnings per share are expected to be in a range of net income of $0.16 to $0.23 per share. The per share earnings amounts are based on fully diluted weighted average shares of 26 million.

Thermage & Medspa MD: What's getting tightened now?

 Thermage actually likes Medical Spa MD enough to buy me a coffee.

Clint Carnell, The VP of Domestic Sales for Thermage and I met for coffee to talk about a number of things, some of which relate to this site. I'd had lunch with Clint previously. Evidently my Thermage rep Chris likes me more than my Botox rep. At least Chris sent me a big hunk of plastic.

thermage_reel.gifHere's a list of parts of the discussion I feel I can divulge.

  • Thermage had some internal discussions about whether it was a good idea to approach or contribute to what amounts to a public forum (this blog) but they've decided to give it a trial run at least. I got the feeling that Clint and others at Thermage were willing to try something that's new in the marketplace on their feeling that I would be fair to them. (With the hammering that Dermacare and the other medical spa franchises
    have taken on this site I give Thermage a great deal of credit for that.) I think that out there. If you're a company and don't have a blog you're doing yourself a disservice. There's no better form of constant contact with your target market as long as you're not just publishing the same old lame press releases. There's a paradigm shift in marketing that changes the traditional way that's taught in schools and I think more highly of Thermage that they're willing to engage in it. It speaks highly of the brains running the company.
Chris Anderson has some feeling on business blogs; "the natural voice of the boss is fundamentally incompatible with the voice of the blogger, at least as regards their own company affairs.". But wait, there's still hope. Chris goes on to say "The best business blogs come from the employees, not the bosses. They have more time, and are less prone to marketing gobbledygook and gnomic platitudes. And those kind of blogs are on the rise, not the decline."


  • Clint told me that a large number of Thermage's reps now read Medspa MD. I thought there was something going on when the Does Thermage Work Poll received 200 positive votes without any negative votes after it had been neck and neck for weeks. Surprise. Good work guys, but now the Cutera reps (they're here too) will probably start dropping that positive percentage. I'm going to have to block ISP's from tallying more than one vote. Perhaps I'll post a Thermage vs. Titan poll and let them battle it out.

  • Thermage has been trying to track down the producers of the refurbished Thermage tips for a while. I gathered that the refurbished tip guys know this since they're changing PO boxes every couple of weeks. Thermage is going to post to this site their position that the study on reactivating or refurbishing Thermage tips is bogus and that the physician who is credited with authoring the paper doesn't exist. I'll be posting Thermages position on this as soon as they send it to me.

  • Thermage is sitting on a number of new thermage tips until they're sure that all their efficacy problems are behind them. I can see that they don't want a repeat of Thermage's previous problems that caused a backlash among physicians. If they can crack the cellulite conundrum they'll be set.

  • I queried Clint about Thermage and the competition from Cutera's Titan and/or Palomar's fractional IR treatment heads. He was reticent to say anything bad about competitors but it was obvious to me that Thermage really thinks that they've got this modality nailed down. I didn't detect any sweating which is good. The companies that focus on what the competition's doing inevitably wind up fighting the wrong battles. I expect to get hard and fast specifics from Thermage and compare the technology providers side by side. Perhaps a Palomar or Cutera rep will pass this up the food chain and we can get some info from them as well. Different strokes for different folks.

  • Clint's smart and I liked him tremendously. Now that Thermage is a public company they face challenges that they didn't when they were private. If Clint is representative of Thermage's leadership I'm impressed.

Portrait Plasma Skin Regeneration: The power of high powered wrinkle gas.

Rhytec's Portrait plasma skin regeneration: A cool little jet engine for wrinkles.
 

Is anyone using Rhytec's Portrait Plasma? I've heard a few docs comment on it but haven't seen it in action yet. Watch an animation of plasma in action or some patient and physician testimonials.

From somewhere on a Rhytec press release:

DownloadServletPlasma may be the next weapon of choice in the anti-aging arsenal. Rather than relying on chemicals, lasers, light, or injections, the Portrait Plasma Skin Regeneration system employs plasma, a highly energized gas. The gas penetrates below the skin's surface, extending into the dermis without any direct contact, charring, or vaporization.

Unlike other treatments that ablate the skin, the controlled heating of tissue below the skin's surface from Portrait, which is FDA-cleared for treatment of wrinkles, superficial skin lesions, and actinic keratosis, leaves the skin surface intact during the healing process.

"By allowing the preserved outer layers of skin to act as a protective dressing until new skin regenerates, it produces much faster healing and minimizes the risk of complications," says Richard E. Fitzpatrick, M.D., an associate clinical professor of dermatology at the University of California–San Diego School of Medicine and one of the clinical investigators of Portrait.

In taking a look at the Portrait site I find myself somewhat unimpressed. The site itself is cumbersome to use and poorly architected. I'd have chosen a different beauty shot to build my imaging around as well. The model seems to have skin stretched so tight that her ears are almost meeting behind her head and such an odd expression that I couldn't exactly call it aspirational. 

However, I'm open to hearing if anyone's had experience, good or bad, with plasma. If the comments are resoundingly positive, maybe I'll buy one to toast marshmellows.

Some of the abstracts from the Rhytec site:

Evaluation of Plasma Skin Regeneration Technology in Low-Energy Full-Face Rejuvenation Bogle M, Arnt K, Dover J, Archives of Dermatology; February 2007

Portait PSR3 Technology Provides True Skin Regeneration Kronemyer B. European Aesthetic Buyers Guide; Spring 2006

Plasma Energy Harnessed for Damaged, Aging Skin Skin & Allergy News Supplement; Spring 2006

Plasma Skin Resurfacing for Rejuvenation of the Neck, Chest and Hands: Investigation of a Novel Device Alster T, Tanzi E. Presented at ASLMS Meeting, Boston, April 2006

Effectiveness of Multiple Treatment, Low Fluence Technique with Plasma Skin Resurfacing for Facial Rejuvenation Bogle M, Arndt K, Dover J. Presented at ASLMS Meeting, Boston, April 2006

Thermage: Do plastic surgeons hate everything non-surgical?

First, I'll state that I like Thermage.

But plasticized raises the questions that have been haunting Thermage since the early days.

thermage.jpgThermage is a radiofrequency device that is meant to create skin tightening and collagen remodeling. It takes multiple treatments to acheive desired results, and is somewhat uncomfortable.

There seems to be a growing consensus among surgeons that Thermage is not everything they hoped it would be. When looking at a presentation by the medical device company that sells Thermage, it is at times difficult to distinguish between the before and after images. We have to strain our eyes to tell the difference (see here). Also, issues with fat atrophy and scarring have surfaced.

The issues story about Thermage fat atropy and scarring that plasticized points to:.

"I was shocked and dismayed over the scars that resulted from this reportedly safe and non-invasive procedure,” said thermage patient, Laurie.

Thanks to White, Laurie doesn't appear to be disfigured. At first glance, you can't tell she suffered second-degree burns to her neck. It's taken her two years of reconstructive procedures, but today she hopes White can hide her last remaining scars.

 Of course my account rep Chris addressed these questions with me just last week. I've invited Chris to submit some posts and rise up to defend Thermage's name. He's said that he'll check with corporate to see if they'll let him.

Does Thermage work? Let's take a poll.

Termage is making strides in improving their Thermacool TC treatment.

  • Thermage treatments offer skin tightening with non-invasive radiofrequency energy
  • Thermage claims to tone and tighten sagging facial and neck skin
  • There is no downtime after Thermage, but maintenance treatments may be necessary

As a medical treatment, do you think Thermage works?

Thermage: Lunch with the VP of Sales.

photo-thermage.jpgToday I had lunch with Clint Carnell, Vice President of Domestic Sales for Thermage.


I  met Clint over at a local pub in Park City and we sat down to chat about Thermage and Surface. (Clint didn't know about this blog.)

Clint is a fairly recent addition to Thermage's management team as the Vice President of Domestic Sales. Most recently, he came from the company Bausch & Lomb, where he oversaw the turn-around of a 25M division of B&L. He has also worked for Johnson & Johnson and has a long resume of larger companies. Clint seems to be a really nice guy. I liked him tremendously and I thought he really understood the marketplace and what was taking place.

I have had problems with Thermage in the past, mostly having to do with the way that I think they were selling their devices to physicians. Over our pizzas, Clint and I talked about a number of problems that I think Thermage is facing and what's happening to the market and physicians. His answers were educational, not in the least defensive, and straight forward.

Themage has been saddled with a number of problems in the past; technician error, physician education, efficacy, pain, expense, and other issues have combined to cause a recession in what was initially a promising growth curve for the adaptation of radio frequency skin tightening. In my opinion, most of this had to do with the way that Themage sales reps were presenting the device to physicians as a fire-and-forget type of technology that you could have a technician performing in the back room while you saw other patients. No physician oversight led to a vicious cycle where, since the treatment was painful, technicians would continually turn down the treatment in order to get the patient through, the patient wouldn't see any results and would complain to the physician, and then the physician would get pissed off. This cycle has ended up leading to declining Themage sales and devastating impact to Thermage's reputation among physicians.

Starting in about September 2005, Thermage has experienced a rebirth of sorts, in part because of a new management team and sales force. They've introduced bigger treatment tips (effectively reducing the price per area) and they have a number of new areas including eyelids and body treatments. They're bringing out a number of additional tips that will go deeper into the dermis to treat cellulite, as well as some specifically for fine lines around the eyes.

This has resulted in Thermage actually starting to experience growth in sales again, which is both good for them and treated patients. They have retrained their sales force and are looking to not only offer additional treatment tips for their device, but potentially expand their offering. The end game of course is that Thermage expects to become a publicly traded company in the future. (Clint and I spoke about this, but since I'm unsure what he may consider confidential I won't go into details.)

Thermage is also supporting the top Thermage providers significantly better than they have in the past. Two years ago providers were treated exactly the same whether they provided one Thermage treatment a year or 1000. As a business, Thermage has decided that the top providers are both more lucrative as a business as well as potentially more beneficial to the patient since Thermage is one of those treatments that is very treatment dependent. It is not a push button technology and results can very dramatically depending upon the treatment levels and number of hits.

(One of the gems that Clint dropped was that they are not focusing more and more of their marketing efforts on those physicians who are actually performing Thermage and expect that other physicians in the market place will look to those leaders and as they become mass market adaptors of this technology.)

In discussing the medical spa market that exists now, Clint was pretty much in agreement with me about the state of the market including medical spa consultants and franchises.

Interestingly, when the discussion turned to plastic surgeons and dermatologists, Thermage (which had been focused almost exclusively on these two specialities in the past), is becoming more and more open to what Clint described as "Blue Collar Doctors" who are physicians that are treating hundreds or thousands of patients a year that might potential be outside of cosmetic medicine as a speciality.

It'll be interesting to see how the plastic surgeons and dermatologists respond to this since there was discussion also about the recent laws passed in Florida preventing non plastic surgeons or derms from overseeing outside clinics.

I talked to Clint a fair amount of time about what their competitors were doing, including Cutera's TitanPalomar's new Fraxel like head and a number of others, and asked him specifically as to whether or not Thermage was worried that some of the technologies were being developed could potentially cause Thermage problems. Clint responded that he expected some good technology development out of all of these competitors and I was pleasantly surprised to see that he didn't take the opportunity to bad mouth any of them, but he felt  that Thermage was still the "gold standard". Our own physicians tend to agree with that statement.

But Thermage faces significant hurdles Fraxel, Cutera's Titan IR head, Palomars Fraxel-like head, and a number of other technologies that are being developed and are getting better. Thermage is going to have to become more than a one trick pony in order to survive as the market consolidates and Clint expressed that was indeed their understanding as well. It will be interesting to see if Thermage is able to execute over the next 24 months.

I was impressed with Clint and if he's representative of Thermage's new look I think it bodes well for Thermage.

Thermage is comission. Titan & Fraxel are hourly.

As business models: Thermage is commission, Titan & Fraxel are hourly.

(Thermage + Fraxel discussion threads)

pages2and15_machine.jpgI had lunch with Clint Carnell, Vice President of Domestic Sales for Thermage today. While we were talking about the current state of the medical spa market he referred to the Thermage business model as 'razors and blades' and it triggered the thought that there was an analogy with commission vs. hourly employees.

Physicians seeking to minimize risk will often try to hire staff on commission with the hopes that they'll achieve two things; a motivated employee, and lower cost per treatment since they'll only be paying a percentage of treatments that are being performed. Nice in theory.

Here's the flip side. Commission robs you of success. This is a business that has very high fixed costs, but once those costs are met, there is a large potential profit to be made. As a business, its usually preferable to absorb those fixed costs if possible and keep the profit rather than have it diluted by paying commissions.

(That's why Surface has decided to grow as an entirely company owned business rather than persuing franchising with it's associated problems. If you have the capital, wholy owned businesses offer the most success while franchises offer the ability to grow the business using other peoples money.) 

petit_fraxel_02.jpgThermage made a radical decision to offer the 'box' (razors) for near cost, and focus on selling the disposables (blades). Smart enough. But Thermage is not charging 100% markup. Thermage tips probably cost around $12-$16 dollars to produce (that's a wild guess) but Thermage sells them for $450 or more. That's a helluva markup and it's led to a built in profit potential for anyone who can figure out a way around it as well as being a source of friction with those who have to buy them. (I have yet to hear any physician anywhere think that Thermage tips are a 'great deal'.) Refurbished Thermage tips came on the scene soon after Thermage launched and have even been studied for safety and performance.

Thermage faces a challenge in keeping providers happy with paying a commission on every treatment they perform. If they can, Thermage promises to be the gold standard for the foreseeable future.

Is Thermage Making A Comeback?

Thermage may have weathered the storms that plagued them early on. Poor training. Poor reviews. Unhappy doctors.

At a meeting this week a Thermage rep told me that they had just had the most profitable four months since they launched. The initiation of Thermage body and eye treatments seems to have helped in addition to making the treatment head bigger.

I've posted on how Thermage brings out the heavy anger here.  Some docs think Thermage is a totally bogus technology. That's the rep that many new treatments encounter. I think Thermage brought most of that trouble on themselves with inadequate training and price gouging. The move to quicker treatments with bigger heads (effectively cutting the price) is a step in the right direction. Thermacool as a treatment is improving, Thermage as a company has been a pain in the ass. I hope that is changing.

If Thermage is going to compete against Cuteras Titan, Fraxel, Palomar's Fraxel head for their Starlux, and whatever else is coming, They're going to have to continue to innovate and out compete. No one likes paying $650 for a piece of plastic and chip that costs $8.